Thursday, May 17, 2007

The Slate piece is not worth your time.

I'm probably too late to have stopped you, but don't bother with this perfunctory architectural review of Seattle ["Seattle's Best (and Worst)," Slate, May 16]. I don't care if someone wants to point out middling Seattle architecture, but do us right by covering it all and being factually correct. Somehow Crosscut come up with 344 fawning words for this junk.

No comments: